PCB Signal Integrity Optimization Using X-ray Metrology


Reading time ( words)

Murphy’s Law

It happens again. A new backbone router/switch build or a line card upgrade is approaching completion when something goes wrong. The system won’t operate at the targeted data rate. Deadlines are looming and the root cause of the problem is buried somewhere in a big rack of electronic components. The integrated circuits were all speed tested prior to printed circuit board assembly. There must be a problem in the system assembly, but where?

For some time, control of printed circuit board manufacturing to specification has relied primarily on coupon tests. These are time-consuming and often poorly represent the live portion of a panel, much less a population of panels. Modifications to designs, variations in line and space widths, and misalignment of layers can occur without the supplier being aware of the impact these changes have on the system’s performance. Electrical test methodologies for bare boards are difficult to maintain, expensive, and provide limited information. Engineers are left to commit large amounts of money to board builds and cloud server manufacturing and hope the PCBs perform per design.

The challenge is getting harder

As the industry moves rapidly to full deployment of 28 Gbps backplanes, many cloud hardware and PCB manufacturers are just beginning to regain confidence that what they build will work as intended. But 56 Gbps backplanes are just around the corner, or already in the driveway for some companies. And line cards are not far behind. These faster data rates require even tighter design compliance and PCB process control.

Certainly, much of this battle will be fought on the design side. Single layer routing, sacrificial vias, and other techniques can mask PCB process variation. But is this the most desirable or cost-effective solution? The time is right for a new generation of metrology tools that will enable PCB manufacturers to build better products and for network designers to unleash the performance of their products without worrying about variances in as-built boards.

To read the full version of this article which appeared in the October 2017 issue of The PCB Magazine, click here.

Share


Suggested Items

Predictive Engineering: Happy Holden Discusses True DFM

10/04/2017 | Andy Shaughnessy, PCBDesign007
Happy Holden has been involved in DFM for over 45 years, since he first started working at HP and optimized their PCB design and manufacturing processes. Naturally, for this issue, Barry Matties and Andy Shaughnessy made it a priority to get Happy’s thoughts on DFM, and what true DFM entails.

Altium’s Sales Plan: Deal Directly with Designers

01/18/2017 | Andy Shaughnessy, PCBDesign007
Altium has been shaking up the EDA world for quite some time. The Australian company once slashed the cost of Altium Designer by 75% to grow market share, and who could forget their famous (or infamous) “Bunny” ad campaign? In this email interview with Lawrence Romine, Altium’s global head of field marketing, he shares his views on sales and marketing in the EDA world, as well as Altium’s philosophy on selling EDA tools.

Making Digital and Analog “Play Nice” at Peavey

07/20/2016 | Andy Shaughnessy, PCBDesign007
Most guitarists have owned a Peavey Electronics amplifier or instrument at some point in their lives. Peavey originally drew accolades for their line-up of high-quality, budget-friendly products. Now the company also develops high-end instruments, amps, and live sound equipment. Peavey was also the last major American musical equipment maker to have product manufactured overseas. I met with Tom Stuckman, an electrical engineer at Peavey, during NAMM and asked him about the technical challenges he faces and what it’s like working at Peavey.



Copyright © 2017 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.